Observing a commandment out of compulsion or naturally
Hello Rabbi,
Has the Rabbi written anything in the past on the subject: keeping the commandments out of struggle and forcing the instinct, versus keeping them out of naturalness and inner desire? Or does he know of any sources on the subject?
Maybe I’ll cite a source for the sake of clarity to make sure I wrote it clearly – there is a lion cub about the mitzvot in which “if” is written even though they are obligatory (as Rashi cites, for example, about “if money lends to my people”) who explains that the reason the Torah used “if” here, as if it were not obligatory, is to teach that these mitzvot are better done out of a natural sense of morality and not just as a royal decree. (I’m not sure I was accurate in what he said, it’s from distant memory. But I think the point has been made clear).
Thank you very much.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Well, what is the Rabbi's opinion?
I think I would say (and so does Rabbi Shalit”a) that there is virtue in both. If you will, there is a moral virtue in one who forces himself (as in Kant's moral theory), and there is an aesthetic or human virtue in one for whom it is natural (here you need a link to the post on aesthetic and human virtues).
So, it seems that the goal of man is to strive for the natural way, but one must go through the stage of coercion (here you need a link to Amnon Yitzhak's bold act). And I wrote briefly.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer