On the Question of Knowledge and Choice and Selection – Maimonides’ Method

peace,
In your book “No Man Has Dominion Over the Spirit,” you (or Hillel on page 137) claim that there is a contradiction in Maimonides’ approach to the question of knowledge and choice. I did not understand what is contradictory in Maimonides’ words.
As Rabbi Kapach says, “Our rabbi, in the depth of his explanation, came to uproot the question from its very foundation. Our rabbi teaches us that the entire question arises from our ignorance of the concepts of God. For if we knew the Lord, the God of Israel, as best we could, there would be no question here, and the whole thing came about only because we imagined and believed that His knowledge was similar to our knowledge or a kind of our knowledge” – that is, contrary to the Rambam’s Rabbad, Tshuva answers.
You yourself brought up the principle that this is a different knowledge than ours on a different but similar subject – the subject of prophecy. Only someone who has not experienced faith can ask how Abraham was sure that he had received a prophecy. Likewise, a blind person will not understand what vision is. The same is true here – there is knowledge here that we do not know. He who invented the concept of knowledge and who is not subject to it and its limitations – can both know in advance and allow choice, and there is no contradiction in this. God, the Blessed and our knowledge are different things, and not like with humans, where we have our knowledge.
I would appreciate your explanation.
thanks