Please explain the essence of the naturalistic connection.
Where did the Rabbi write clearly about this fallacy? And is it a logical fallacy? On Wikipedia I saw that they write that it is not a logical fallacy.
– https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9B%D7%A9%D7%9C_%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%99
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
I don’t know what a logical and illogical fallacy is.
As for the naturalistic fallacy, it has several definitions. In fact, I’m talking about the ought-is fallacy. The naturalistic fallacy is a slightly different fallacy that Moore formulated. That’s the accepted terminology. I’ve written about it in several places, for example here:
הלכה ומציאות – מהי מומחיות הלכתית
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
