pluralism
Does pluralism entail a necessity to act according to all truths?
To believe in all theistic beliefs, for example?
How is the plurality of truths realized in practice?
If there is something in a particular theistic belief that commands me or that concerns me, but I don’t believe in that belief but I am a pluralist, does that mean I am obligated to it?
I didn’t understand a word. But I am not a pluralist, so don’t ask me to explain or defend it.
I'll explain myself better,
Maybe I phrased myself poorly.
I'm not asking you to defend the position of pluralism, I'm not a pluralist either, I think it's a mistake that creates a lot of contradictions.
I'm just asking you based on what you know about pluralism, I'm trying to understand what the source or basis is on which it is based.
For example, if pluralism indicates that everything is true and everything is correct, what does this obligate pluralists to do?
To actively believe in all beliefs?
My question in general is based on what you know, how should a pluralist behave in the context of multiple truths for him?
There are different definitions of pluralism. It's a pretty confusing bunch. Generally, the prevailing view is that a person should do whatever they want.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
