Problem with responses

It turns out that the response required approval for some reason. We approved it, and I hope it doesn't come back.

Several times I tried to send a question to the site and was prevented from doing so by a demand that I solve an addition or subtraction exercise to prove that I am not a robot.

And here I ask: Why are robots prevented from asking questions of the site owner? And what about the addition and subtraction exercises? Is this Plato's Academy, where it is written that those who do not know mathematics should not enter.

It seems to me that as long as the state has not imposed a duty of ‘core studies’ on robots – the site owner has no right to prevent robots from participating in the site's discussions, and an explicit reading is: ‘Robot girls made a soldier’ 🙂

With greetings, Zvi S. Turinger, author of the book Midrash Robot on the Torah

On the contrary, it is to prove that you are indeed a robot.

You don't have to keep entertaining us.

In the Bible, a woman who will sow and bear a child

Many blessings, to the tsat of the rifles, and blessings of championship

It seems to the author that the mechanism that prevents robots from asking questions is justified, but does not prevent them from responding to the comments site.

There is a well-known story about one of the great men of Israel who was elected rabbi in the community, and the community's scholars decided to try his hand at presenting a complicated question that they had invented. The rabbi tried unsuccessfully to find an answer to the question, and then asked: ‘Is this a real case or an invented question?’, explaining that only a real question that concerns practical – does the rabbi have divine help to rule according to halakhah.

And from this we learn that even in the legal field, the rabbi has divine assistance precisely in answering those who ask questions in practical terms, but when the questioner is a robot – even if he is full and brimming with Torah knowledge – then he is not obligated by the commandments, and therefore his questions are ‘practical terms’ and therefore the rabbi should not be bothered to seek an answer to them without divine assistance.

With greetings, Martin Hindick,
author of the book ‘The Place of Artificial Intelligence’

Paragraph 3, line 3
… and therefore his questions are not ‘in practice’…