property

But it's simple that the value of an object is measured according to the uses it is worth, for example a coat in winter, if for the sake of that matter let's say the value of using it for heating costs one hundred shekels (and it's simple that a coat in winter has a real value according to the use it puts to), then if it is determined that it is worth a million (apart from the law of fraud, which is an external law, and there are also paintings in which there is no fraud when it is explicitly applied), then I don't own an object worth a million, but a hundred.

And the rabbi also did not answer me if he had an article on how the property system works, such as Gamirot Daat.

I don't remember. There is a book called Peri Moshe that concentrates all the material and discussions on buyers. A critical read but definitely a very useful book.

May I not have a problem with Mr. Lee? I didn't have a problem at all. When they determined a different value, there is a "for me it's worth it" here.

It's simple for me that for me it's worth it without it being under the law of haggling, he won't be obligated for a simple reason, after all, if someone damaged a bottle of water that costs me five shekels in a store, for example, and I decide that it's worth five hundred shekels to me, he won't be obligated to give me that amount for the simple reason that a bottle of water doesn't contain such value
And the truth is, I don't understand at all how an agreement between the parties can determine that the object will contain more value
P.S. I was less connected to the content of this book and I'm looking for an article by the rabbi

What are the acronyms for the cross?
I searched for it on Google and couldn't find it

Lesson file. Didn't I bring it there?