Quantum
Hello Rabbi,
A. Why does a theory like “Schrodinger’s Cat” not contradict the Rabbi’s words about the problematic nature of the “unity of opposites” theory?
B. Doesn’t quantum theory help resolve the question of “the rationality of the world”? You proposed the solution of “ideological vision,” but perhaps it is also possible to propose the opposite – the world changes according to human consciousness and therefore everything is appropriate?
Thanks in advance.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Hello,
What does the borrowed description “half alive, half dead” mean?
I understand that there is a probabilistic wave function here that will collapse into one of the possibilities when the observation/measurement is made.
If so, what does this mean? What is the cat's live/dead state?
The cat is not in a state of death or life. It is a state of a wave function, not of a cat. The cat is created when there is a collapse, and then it is either alive or dead.
Rabbi Michi, you are trying to dance about two weddings at the same time. Your argument is in a state of superposition. (This in itself proves that there is a logical contradiction)
On the one hand, you use language and say that superposition is not a contradictory state. (And this is true because it is a description in language)
And on the other hand, you claim that there is no logical contradiction in nature. (How do you prove this? From language?)
So you decide, either logic applies only to language and then the argument “there is a logical contradiction in nature” has no meaning.
Or logic applies to nature and then superposition is a contradictory state.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer