Questions about arbitrator laws

Thanks to the rabbi for the answer

I read the laws of the Borer in the Pennai Halacha
I understand the Pennai Halacha differently from the Rabbi (Michael Avraham)
The Pennai Halacha states
“But he is permitted to lift the ladle out of the soup close to the side, in such a way that only the vegetables and noodles are lifted in the ladle, because he does not do this as a choice in the vessel but as a way of taking the food”
I understood from what is written here that as long as the ladle is in the pot, he is permitted to tilt it a little to remove the water.
(Rabbi Melamed did not write to tilt, but as far as I understand, as long as the ladle is in the pot, it is possible to filter it further
Maybe I just didn't understand)
Did I miss something?
My question is also a little different from the case that Rabbi Melamed describes, because in the Pennai Halacha, as far as I understand, he deals with the case where you only want the vegetables, while my case is where you find a lot of soup with vegetables and then dilute it with a spoon and press it against the side.
So that in the end there is soup and vegetables but less soup.

Is there even room to allow even more and to claim that even after the ladle is out of the pot, it is permissible to return it to the pot and attach it to dilute the soup so that there is some soup left and also vegetables but less soup?

Regarding the choice of wetness, here is what is written on the Kosher website at the following link
https://www.kosharot.co.il/index2.php?id=42017&lang=HEB

Under the section “Choice of wetness”
“Some say that there is no choice of wetness and some say that there is a choice of wetness”.

I very much identify with the rabbi's practical approach and with the things he wrote
” But if there is a mitigating opinion, there is room for leniency. From your point of view, they trust it and you respect it. It is not that you are doing the prohibition, but they”
I think it is right and appropriate to try as much as possible to find reasons to eat at someone else's place as long as it is within reasonable halachic limits.

You didn't quote the passage I was referring to. He writes there that if there is soup left in the ladle, you shouldn't pour it back into the pot because it's waste from his perspective. Apparently he's forbidding what you asked. I'm not sure he's talking about soup left in the ladle when there are vegetables in it, and that's exactly what your prohibition is, or that he's talking about soup alone, but I don't see any difference in that. I'm also not sure I agree with the prohibition itself.
Regarding the choice of liquid, you're talking about a solid in a liquid, like vegetables in soup. I didn't understand what you meant. In any case, I answered.

I feel like a convert to the laws of Borer and at a relatively older age I have started to improve in this regard.
My immediate environment does not strictly observe these laws and I read all the laws of Borer from Pnini Halacha a while ago and also researched on the internet but many points are not clear to me.

I want to check that I completely understood your answers

1. In your opinion, in the case of diluting soup that remains in the ladle, both vegetables and soup, this is not Borer and it is permissible.
2. Regarding returning a spoon, in Pnini Halacha it is written
“One should not pour the unnecessary soup from the ladle back into the pot”
The Rabbi wrote
“I am not sure I agree with the prohibition itself”
So in practice, do you permit the matter and would you pour the water back?
Or would you not do so because you are hesitating over the doubt?
Personally, I did not understand the Rabbi's teaching that if you pour soup from a ladle into a bowl, something will remain in the ladle. It seems strange to me that you cannot return it to the soup.

And I also want to thank you personally, Rabbi, for answering every question.
I asked several questions and learned a lot from the Rabbi's answers and searching the answers on the website.
In addition, I am fascinated by the Rabbi's series on YouTube,
"Innovation and Tradition."
I have gone through most of the lessons.

I wrote that I am not sure about that. But this is a deliberate choice and there is room for leniency.
Regarding returning soup from the ladle to the pot, I explained that I am not sure that is what he meant. Indeed, it does not seem like there should be a problem with that.