New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Religious in my opinion as a concept

שו”תCategory: generalReligious in my opinion as a concept
asked 1 year ago

Hello, as a preface to my question, I would like to point out that it is clear to me that it can be answered in a dry and shallow manner, but I am specifically addressing you based on my familiarity with your content and lessons in the hope that you can shed some light on the subject from your unique perspective. This subject has been weighing heavily on me lately and connects somewhat with your series on innovation, conservatism, and tradition that I am just finishing and would appreciate a detailed answer and even directions and links for further study. Thanks in advance.
I recently heard from a number of people that I I hold them to be rational and intelligent people who define themselves as semi-religious, “religious in my opinion,” or somewhere on the scale between religious and secular.
I will clarify at the beginning that it is clear to me that no one is perfect and keeps all the commandments, and therefore everyone is not completely religious or is somewhere on the scale (according to a view that would claim that a perfectly religious person is only one who keeps all the commandments).
However, the separation in my opinion is their lack of ambition to be somewhere different.
For example, there are people who are unable to get up for the minyan in the morning but claim that they would like to succeed or strive for it. In the concept I am talking about, there is no such aspiration. For example, it is enough to pray on Shabbat evening and that is it. (I know that this may remind me of classic traditionalists, but it feels like a slightly different and more modern concept to me.)
I will add that personally I have a very hard time with this perception because it would have been much easier for me to be “religious” if I had defined myself as religious who does not observe Shabbat, but I feel that it would be simple to work on myself and it would become that in the end I do what I am comfortable with – if it fits with religion, great, if not then that’s fine too.
On the other hand, I am aware that there are certain commandments that I also don’t really understand and, to be honest, don’t really aspire to keep. In addition, I have difficulty finding a fundamental difference between a person who simply prays in the minyan/does not keep Shabbat because it is not important to him and a person who claims that it is important to him but is unsuccessful (I think it comes down to a matter of priorities and in the end, prayer/keeping Shabbat is not prioritized enough in both cases and there is no fundamental difference between them). Therefore, the difference between the perceptions is a bit unsettling to me, and I would appreciate clarification from you.
In conclusion, of course everyone will do what they feel is right, but I would love to hear your opinion regarding such concepts as “semi-religious,” and especially such concepts that define a new set of rules that both give you comfort (not keeping Shabbat, for example) and also give you a feeling of connection to religion, etc. without telling stories of “I can’t get up to pray,” etc.


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 1 year ago
I would distinguish between three levels here:
  1. What am I committed to (i.e. what is right in my opinion).
  2. What do I strive for (assuming that a person does not always strive to do what is right in their eyes. A controversial assumption).
  3. What do I actually do?
In principle, none of these three levels is identical to the other two. See columns 172-3 on weakness of will. And now to your question: A person who does not think it is right to observe all of the halacha (regardless of what it says. He may have his own opinions on this) is not religious, that is, he is not committed to the halacha. Commitment to the halacha is on level 1. A person who thinks that indeed all of the halacha is binding, but does not strive to do so (level 2) because he is weak or because he does not feel like it or because he is angry with God, the Holy One, or for any other reason, is religious in principle, and therefore this can be the “semi-religious” with some religious meaning. Someone who thinks and strives but does not do it is the regular religious (of course, not every religious person does a different amount of halacha, but in principle this is the regular one).

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

בנימין replied 1 year ago

I still have trouble pinpointing the difference between level 1 and level 2. The very aspiration sounds to me like something immeasurable or absolute.
What is the difference between a person who understands that this is the halakha but it is not important enough to him and therefore has no aspiration to observe it versus a person who supposedly "aims" to observe a certain halakha but in the end it is not prioritized enough for him and does not observe the halakha.
It feels like an excuse to tell myself – saying that I aspire to observe all sorts of things and in reality observing only what I prioritize (seems exactly like someone who chooses which mitzvot are convenient for him and which are less so)

מיכי Staff replied 1 year ago

If you're looking for measurable things - go to physics. One might wonder if it's not a quantitative difference in how important it is to you, but I don't think so. It's similar to what I described in column 661. See there.

בנימין replied 1 year ago

I will continue to look and maybe come back with more questions later.
Thank you very much!

Leave a Reply

Back to top button