Review of the trilogy – sequel

https://mishgiotnakeni.wixsite.com/mishgiot-nakeni/post/review-of-the-trilogy-of-Rabbi-Michael-Avraham
I would be happy for the Rabbi to answer the first question that also bothered me while reading the first volume of the trilogy:
“The final part, which discusses the origin of belief in the Torah from heaven and the obligation to fulfill its commandments, which on the surface seems to be the main part of the book and the most fundamental in the trilogy, is surprisingly the most neglected and superficial part of all.”
Establishing faith is apparently less important to the author than analyzing Anselm’s ontological argument, it’s ridiculous.
The content is also clearly problematic, and is yet another example of the author’s amateurism. Just as nothing can be learned from the Bible, it is impossible to learn from it the “evidence argument.” Maimonides in the Mora already rejected it (Chapter 32; there are contradictory places, as is his custom in the Mora, but I agree).