Ruler
Hello Rabbi,
In fact, it can be argued that the laws of nature are ancient and do not need a creator.
So since all the laws of nature are a total of 4 basic laws, why think that they require a savior?
That’s the physiochemical argument.
The cosmological has been abolished in principle (because the definition of the laws that are ancient).
So there is no reason to claim a Creator and there is no rational reason to think about it.
First, the laws of nature are not just statements, but descriptions of how nature works. For something to be a cause, it must exist.
Second, see the third notebook for a response to this argument (the distinction between the principle of sufficient reason and the principle of causality).
The Rabbi has been wrong since quantum mechanics.
???
He wants to argue that quantum theory shows that not everything has a cause.
I also explained the quantum theory relationship in my book. That is not true.
By inventing all sorts of explanations without a scientific basis such as the conservation of entity and turning the wheel of history back 1500 years to the reality of July matter. So it may be an explanation.
Is it rational? It is unclear. …
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
