straw
In honor of Rabbi Shalom
Blessings 2nd Edition
The master said, “From the time the priests enter to eat with their offerings and remember him, from the time they recite the Shema in the evening, from the time the poor man enters to eat, they are tempted with salt until he is about to leave his meal. “Sifa, surely, the true one is the true one. Risha, who is the true one?” Not the poor man and the priest, he is one hundred percent.
From the poor – who has no candle to light at his meal:
[Quoted in the tradition of the Shas on Rashi] In the Yuma, may God bless him and grant him peace, Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Asi unanimously said: “He who has a morsel of bread in his hand is not like him who does not have a morsel of bread in his hand.” And unanimously said: “He who sees and eats is not like him who does not see and eats.” Rav Yosef said: “From here, an allusion is made to the Sumin who eat and there is no eye.” Abaye said: “So, from whom did you eat, you did not eat a meal except in the morning.” Rabbi Zira, may God have read ( Ecclesiastes 6:9 ) “The sight of the eyes is good, the way of the soul.”
Therefore, Rashi wrote that a poor person has no candle and does not eat at night, not because he cannot eat, but because he is not full.
And I was struck by the fact that the Ḥ”ā of the G”m is a Kohen and ani, even though the Kohen is the time of the stars and not the day, and this contradicts Rashi, who says that the time of the Aḥīn is during the day, not at night, and the stars are out at night, and another example of the G”m’s conclusion is that the Aḥīn is after the Kohen, that is, after the stars are out, and this is certainly night.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
But if there is a rule in the day that one does not eat at night, and if so, a poor person does not eat because he does not have a candle, then what is the difference between a priest and a poor person? This is the coming of the stars. The rule does not change because of our issue.
The rule changes during our issue, so I see no reason why the Yuma issue believes that the time of the poor is X, even though in our issue there is a stage where they believe it is Y.
But if we are aware of the rule in the day, it should not have been like this.
And even the conclusion of the G.M. contradicts the rule in the day
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer