Summarize on Wikipedia with fun (soft palm)
Shalom Rabbi Michael Avraham Yanserach God with Descartes and Kant upon them the salutation
The poet Hanan Ben Ari (born 1911) sings against generalizations, summaries, and welcome social initiatives – Wikipedia
1Do you think that after we internalized that every person is unique, separate, and special, etc., they didn’t go overboard with this software?
To the point that it is impossible to have any discussion without it, not all Haredim/religious/Arabs/Muslims/Vizhnitz/Darfuris, etc.
Maybe we can talk in a slightly more ‘simplistic’ way and connect to something. It’s more convenient to allow Wikipedia to summarize like this for the enjoyment of the knowledge seekers among us.
2. In Mr.’s opinion, is the difference between Einstein and Bohr, Schrödinger and Co. very great? If not, what is the explanation? And if so, what is it? Is it a different essence or something else? With great blessings, Sihon Zmilovsky.
I debated whether to delete this gibberish, but given my aversion to censorship, I will settle for outlining rules that serve as a warning: A. The question must be written clearly and well-formulated. B. There is no point in raising a general question here that requires an entire course as an answer.
Your Honor, thank you for not deleting the question, it can be a bit soul-wrenching.
1
2 As someone who spat blood on equations in theoretical physics, etc., etc., what do you think of Albert Einstein's unique genius in relation to the physicists of his generation with whom he studied and talked, etc., etc.
He was a great genius.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
