supervision

peace

The Rabbi writes a lot about the issue of God’s lack of active providence. I studied what the Rabbi wrote in the book extensively, and since I am not philosophically sophisticated [yet, some day…] and I cannot really argue with the Rabbi, I believe that the Rabbi explained his teachings to people who do understand philosophy, and they disagreed with the Rabbi. What was the reason they told the Rabbi that they disagreed with him? Is there a fundamental reason?
thanks