The legal system

I completely stand behind it, and more so. But with respect to the current debates, I oppose legal reform because it upsets the balance to the other side. I wrote several columns recently on my website about this matter, and I explained there that the need for reform because of the distortions created in the relations between the authorities is almost indisputable. Only fools deny it. And this is exactly the column you linked to. But on the other hand, the solution offered by Rothman and Levin throws out the baby with the bathwater, and therefore I oppose it. Among other things, I also wrote that the debates and disputes between various petitions that are being published these days are imaginary. Those who oppose the reform may agree with the need to reform, but they claim that it is not in this way and form (they oppose the reform, in the Ministry of Justice and not in vain). And those who support it say that although the reform is problematic, it is important to reform the relations between the authorities in Israel (they support the reform, in the Ministry of Justice and not in vain). Both sides are essentially saying the same thing and the difference is mainly in sentiment. These are not my interpretations, but rather the explicit statements of several of the signatories on both sides. By the way, this is what demonstrates for the thousandth time the universal law of uncertainty in public debate: the smaller the distance between the parties, the more heated and extreme the debate between them. Regarding Haredi versus religious Zionism (compared to their attitude towards secularists), or religious Zionism versus Reform (compared to its attitude towards secularists). In my opinion, there is currently a consensus in Israel regarding fundamental values ​​and the constitution that has not prevailed here for many years. I also dedicated a column to this on the website. Goodbye,