Taylor

Hello Rabbi
Regarding your proof from Taylor, isn’t it possible to say that the world that I do see, I see it precisely because of my eyes, so that by definition there would be a correspondence between the two. In other words, my seeing the world is a result of the evolutionary development of my eyes, and therefore of course I can trust what I see, because there is a definitional correspondence between the two?

That is, I do not trust evolution to have created a complete connection between how I see the world and how it really is, because there is really no guarantee of that if the goal of evolution is survival, but rather I trust evolution that the form of the world that I see thanks to the eyes I have is the form that is survival-friendly for me. In other words, the world that I am forced to deal with in order to survive is the world that my eyes reflect, not a world that I have to “adapt” to.
thanks