Territory considerations

But here we are talking about the public domain, not the territory of the individual. Isn't that a different case?

I didn't understand. The protester is preventing me from traveling on a road that I have permission to travel on. You're right that it's not like breaking into my private home, but there's still room for territorial considerations even in such a situation. By the way, even in the halacha, the dead around me in public are considered my property.

I remember you saying somewhere that the owner of the road (the public) allows protesters to demonstrate on it in this way, and therefore there is no permission to pass in such a case (something like that).

This is not a demonstration with a license. It is clear that if they have permission, there is no discussion.

You are right about the difference in the law of persecution, I accepted it.
But you wrote that even without it I have a permit (like a thief) and what you think prevents it is that there is a police force that can handle it. The police can *maybe* handle it but in practice, it is clear that it will take a lot of time (otherwise it is clear that there is no permit at all). Z”A- Even if there is treatment but it is one that is not good enough == infringes on my territory, I still need to have a permit

Very unlikely. What about someone who just dreams at a traffic light? He also delays me. There is common sense and proportionality. What's more, the owner of the road (the public) does not allow it to be cleared in this way.
You have to remember that this is not the same as a thief, because he takes something that is mine and the protestor just doesn't let me use the road (which is not really mine) passively.

Dreaming at a traffic light - not relevant to the discussion because it is accidental and therefore by definition is not considered an infringement of the territory.
Of course I use reason and proportionality - if the police arrive after two hours to clear the road, then the blocker has harmed me with two hours' wages - that's the shekel from the original example but with actual damage. And if you're already demanding reason and proportionality - what about a thief who came to steal only a shekel from me?
I don't understand the distinction between active and passive damage - what is important to our discussion is the infringement of the territory.
Regarding the owner of the road who does not allow it - and what if it is a block in no man's land?