The authority of the sages against Scripture

You wrote;
Beyond that, the sermon can contradict the plain text and there is no contradiction. The plain text stands in its place and the sermon stands in its place and both are binding. – How are both binding, if one follows the plain text and the sermon together?

Beyond that, even the sages who proposed such an interpretation understood that it was against the plain text. – This is part of the problem….

There is no reason to assume that there was a disruption, although it is necessary to discuss why they interpreted it this way and not according to the plain text. And I answered that above. – Where did you answer above?

What I meant in the first part is that how can it be said that both are obligatory? After all, the religious claim that only the sermon is obligatory in the observance of daily halakha.

From the author, I wrote an article establishing the authority of the resident, and I addressed at length, among other things, the contradiction between the resident and the resident, which you can see here in chapters 6 and 7:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mK1MZ7j0Y0fB5ljZpVqSw5beZZwIYuN6/view

Thanks, I'll look into it later.

Do you have a name for the example settlement I brought up? I mean, pierced his ear with a door or a mezuzah?

I know the answers to basic contradictions like an eye for an eye, which speaks of what should be maintained in the offender, a kind of ideal reality for example.
But in my example, there is no possibility of such a settlement.

Yes. This is not a specific settlement of this or that contradiction, but rather general explanations of why the Toshâbâ should not be rejected because of its contradiction to the Toshâbâ (for example, that the Toshâbâ represents the ancient halakha from the time of the desert, and the Toshâbâ represents the later halakha from the time of the entry into the Land). Overall, I want to compare the status of tradition to the status of the written word, and in any case, in the event of a contradiction between them, the tradition should not be automatically rejected.

Indeed, when it is impossible to fulfill both, the Harash is the determining factor. In many cases, both are implemented together. I have already answered the question.