The evidence from the coronavirus?
In the SD
Hello Rabbi,
Following the situation of “Yahweh and YHWH”, there are a number of preachers who demand the situation both from the “prophetic” level (what does this signify for the future), and from the moral level – what is worthy of strengthening.
As I think there are claims that even once, in the thousands of thousands of different religions, they tended to interpret that disasters in the world came as a result of the gods, but they did not necessarily learn a moral or lifestyle lesson from this, because for example, they interpreted that the gods themselves were the ones who argued as a result of internal intrigues in their kingdom and caused an indirect disaster here in creation…
Anyway,
Regarding the preachers on the prophetic level – I think this significantly strengthens the physio-theological and cosmological evidence because it shows that the human tendency is to interpret causes following a personal factor (and perhaps Ockham’s scepter is for the person himself who is a personal “subject”, and for the world the insistence on the known will be in relation to him himself..)
And the preachers who demand on the normative value level – seemingly it is not clear how they even dare to draw on worked-out norms. But as above.
It is true that the entire discussion here is tainted with tautology – after all, the religious preacher is a religious preacher and this is his path in the sacred, and he drew his conclusions based on previous assumptions that are not directly related to what I wrote. But I have a deep feeling that there is still some kind of revelation here about the way of human thinking (although it is a question of the people who interpreted gods without morality).
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.