New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

The first one

שו”תCategory: philosophyThe first one
asked 6 years ago

Peace and blessings.
A. In your first book in the trilogy, you brought your own final rejection of the ontological view at the end. I was unable to understand what that rejection was.
on. In the discussion about those who forbid questioning in faith lest he deny, you said that this has no meaning because, as you say, if he is convinced by the words of heresy, then from the outset he was a covert atheist because he had accepted the assumptions beforehand, etc. This claim is not necessary, because it is possible that following the questioning the person decided to adopt other assumptions and then he went from being a believer to an atheist and was not one to begin with.


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 6 years ago
But even if this decision was not made, if he had met the other arguments he would have decided so, so even if he did not meet them he is still considered a covert atheist. Indeed, it is not entirely necessary.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button