The one who innovates speaks about him.
There is such a concept called the Chazon Ish, I think, that the one who brings forth the vision from his author, the intention is to renew something.
The rabbi has no idea where the aforementioned Chazon Ish is.
And generally, in the law of one who takes the evidence from his partner, is it possible for one to be held but is new from the simplicity and therefore the other will be considered held in the claims?
I know of such a habeas corpus in relation to the dispute between the PNI and the habeas corpus regarding the obligation of proof in financial damages. See my Migo pamphlet here on the site. There I stated this, and I believe I cited another source for this principle there.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer