The status of traditionalists
In the case of a decree that the majority of the public cannot abide by, that the decree is not valid, are traditionalists considered to be the ‘majority of the public’, if so, all the regulations of the Sages that the majority of the public does not abide by. [And the Mai’iri of the 7th century wrote: It is written that even if they accepted the decree and then could not abide by it, it can be annulled], and the decrees of the last generation [such as electricity according to those who say that it is a rabbinic law]
What is the definition of when we become part of the public? Someone who only observes ‘Yom Kippur’? Or even someone who speaks to the Shehar is not considered..
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Isn't the one who speaks to the She”R also part of this minyan?
And if someone tries to keep the mitzvot, but due to lack of knowledge, does he violate the Sabbath?
I don't know where the line is drawn in Diko. There is a gray area, but it has two clear sides. These are Rabbi Jeremiah's questions.
What is the limit? Until when is a question legitimate and when does it become a question of R’ Jeremiah? 😉
What lines of thought can be used to define such a boundary?
What are the clear sides of the rabbi's approach? Is a traditionalist who does not travel on Shabbat, does not do homework, does not light a fire, and generally observes the prohibitions of the Torah intentionally or not considered?
Or is it just a person who is part of a religious community?
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer