The universe as a necessity of reality
peace,
Why can’t the universe as a whole be seen as the necessity of reality?
After all, there is a law of conservation of energy and mass.
The same amount of energy will always exist. Why assume that it is not a necessity of reality?
And if we continue Leibniz’s cosmological argument also towards the “necessity of reality,” it would be possible to assume that it does not exist… for now we assume this.
2. Existence is not a property of matter, so what does it even mean to be the necessity of reality? It is empty of content.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I am now declaring a timeout on the subject of evidence for God. Most of the questions have been answered, and I am repeating the same things over and over again. Please search the site in questions and notebooks. I will not answer these topics again until further notice.
I apologize, it is not your fault (except that you probably did not read what has already been written here, or at least not carefully enough) but neither am I. I am simply exhausted. In the last few days alone, I think there have been hundreds of messages on this subject, and I have a few more things to do in my life. I am sorry.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
