Thought experiment

I read your book The Science of Freedom, and you do use it in thought experiments to answer basic questions. The question I'm trying to answer is basically whether it's appropriate to believe in an event that on the one hand my senses and memory say happened, but reason and logic say that such a thing could not possibly happen (i.e. I can't think of any logical explanation for how it happened). Some people say that they believe in knowledge and choice or in private providence or in general believe in God because they believe in the Torah/Chazal/tradition even though they don't actually understand what these things say or they admit that they don't make sense to them. There are also Christians who believe in meaningless sentences like He is the Father, He is the Son, He is the Holy Spirit. Is it possible to reject such events simply on the grounds that they don't make sense on their own and therefore there is no reason to address them, or vice versa - to say that it probably happened and that I probably need to update my beliefs and give up some of the laws of logic in certain places in my knowledge.

There is no such thing as giving up the laws of logic.
Thought experiments are a very important tool. But I have also written about my opinion on forming positions on situations that are far from you (see my article on ruling on halakhic law in extreme situations).

Can I have a link to the article?
Thanks

https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%A4%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%9C%D7%9B%D7%94-%D7%91%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%90%D7%94-%D7%95%D7%9E%D7%A9%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%94-%D7%9C%D7%93%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%AA/