New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

To rule on a law

שו”תCategory: Talmudic studyTo rule on a law
asked 4 years ago

1. If someone who has not reached the teaching level, has not completed Shas and is not familiar with the poskim, etc., studies a certain issue, and sees that the conclusion of the halakhah contains a disagreement among the latter, and from his study of the issue it seems to him to be one of them, can he act according to this method? Or, since he has not reached the teaching level, is the matter not beyond doubt, and he must act according to the rule that doubts in the Torah are to be stricter and doubts in the rabbis are to be lenient?
 
2. What (in your opinion, that there is almost complete autonomy and that everyone should learn and arrive at a halacha from the study according to their understanding) is the meaning of the rules of the paragraph? What does the rule of “halacha as a rabbinic text, halacha as a tradi, halacha as a mere mishnah, halacha as the Rambam or the Riff, halacha as a mara da’tra, etc. etc.” mean to me if in the end I have to reach my own conclusion?


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 4 years ago
1. I don’t know what the meaning of the instruction is. If he feels he is the most righteous, then he will act as he understands. 2. The rules in the Gemara itself are binding, like everything else in the Gemara. Although it should be taken into account that these rules are not truly sweeping, but only directed in a general way. We do not learn from the generalities even in a place where it says except. Thus we find that the Rambam ruled as I did on additional issues beyond Ya’al Kagam and the like. Rules that follow the Gemara are an ill-intentioned invention and should not be followed.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button