Torah from heaven how
Shalom Rabbi, in the book of cateriology, the Rabbi wrote that even if the Torah is late, it does not harm faith because there is a kernel of revelation and tradition, but according to critics, there is no tradition because everything was written at one time (the Deuteronomic school) and also that it is not right to say that this part is indeed late, and this is not because the entire Torah is in a chiastic structure of a strict connection between the parts and the parashots (whether by an editor or not) and what Moses did bring down to us
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Why are they not right?
Do you want an essay on biblical criticism here?
To Itamar –
The Deuteronomistic school is a view attributed to the authors of parts of the Bible (most of Deuteronomy and Kings, for example). But on the contrary, it is the one that gives, the documentary approach holds that there are additional schools of thought and earlier sources (E and J, for example; a fierce debate has erupted over the priestly source, with Kaufman arguing against and Huizen arguing that it is earlier).
In general, today the accepted approach in biblical research is actually the study of the types 🙂
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
