New on the site: Michi-bot. An intelligent assistant based on the writings of Rabbi Michael Avraham.

Victims of culture

שו”תCategory: Torah and ScienceVictims of culture
asked 6 years ago

Has the Rabbi read Reuven Freiman’s new book ‘Criminals of Culture’? If so, I would appreciate some brief feedback on the subject, what does the Rabbi say? And does he recommend it?
Also, at that time, his book ‘Clear Faith’ was published – did the Rabbi read it?
http://www.sefer.org.il/Product/36162947/%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%AA%D7%A8%D7%91%D7%95%D7%AA—%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%91-%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%95%D7%91%D7%9F-%D7%A4%D7%99%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%9F-
 
https://www.dshir.co.il/product/543


Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

0 Answers
מיכי Staff answered 6 years ago
I didn’t read.

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

לוי replied 6 years ago

Has anyone here read?

י.ג replied 6 years ago

Yigal Libernet has been harshly criticized on Facebook. There are many omissions and inaccuracies that appear to have been made maliciously.

אלעד replied 6 years ago

Yigal Lieberant did not address any of the book's claims.
He only took a specific passage to emphasize what he wanted to convey and did not want to address the essence of the things – and touched on a small and marginal matter about Michelangelo’.
If he had any comments about the book, he could have emailed the rabbi – and if something needs to be corrected in the book, he would have corrected it in the next edition – because the things are minor compared to what the book writes in its entirety – especially since he only addressed one part of one chapter in the book.
This is called pure demagogy.
Rabbi Fairman directly criticizes the root of Yigal's work and livelihood, which is what he makes money from – criticizing empty and contentless art.
So instead of taking seriously the rabbi's words for which he has no answer – he only took specific passages and said, look, they don't call it a’ But in ’ according to this and that book in this and that language – and did not address in depth the fracture, emptiness and lack of morality that exists in general art.

How do you know that this was done intentionally?
Maybe ask the rabbi by email?
I asked him – and of course he rejected it immediately.
Let me remind you that the rabbi taught at the universities of Tel Aviv and Haifa – not in tin places.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button