Violating the “Corona” lockdown for livelihood purposes
Hello,
How should a person who violates the “Corona” lockdown for livelihood purposes be treated, claiming that he has nothing to feed his children?
Kind regards, Benjamin
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Is violating a lockdown on such grounds less serious?
Obviously. An individual's overlap is not permissible. Far from it. And if there is a great need, it is certainly understandable that he overlaps. If Adan is confirmed to be ill, it is more problematic, of course.
Because it seems like you have a skyrocketing tolerance for some of the questioners here.
I'm working on my measurements. 🙂
Regarding tolerance for quarantine violators, what about the categorical order?!
The categorical order says that anyone who is in financial distress will be covered. This is a general law.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
