Where are we headed?

The rabbi doesn't know Kirk at all, so I'll point out that the Wikipedia entry is very anti-Semitic and unfair (or, God forbid, neutral). As the rabbi hypothesized, the entry is part of the Progress Protocol, as unfortunately happens with many entries.
The entire part about an anti-Semitic conspiracy is fabricated and delusional, and so on. Since this is the third response I've written on his behalf, I'll point out that I don't feel any ideological identification with him at all, he's an American right-winger, less my taste, but he's certainly not delusional or extremist. His words were legitimate and calm and aligned with the mainstream right-wing in America, the part with the coronavirus is shared by the American right and most of it is not conspiratorial like the version we knew in Israel, more of a philosophical dispute about freedom in democracy.
His character is no more problematic than any other well-known right-wing figure in the US, and more moderate than figures like Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh or Trump Rachel.

Did the rabbi read the cherry picking on the rabbi in the ’complex’?

Reading it suggests that Epicurus was more religious than the rabbi.

I haven't read it. I'm aware of the agendas on Wikipedia (my son was a very central Wikipedian in the early years). But there are statements there about the cure for Corona, etc. that sounded delusional. Like Trump's. But it doesn't matter. My words don't depend on any of that.

Of course. I didn't criticize the rabbi, God forbid, I just knew.
I responded strongly on the subject, because the murder shocked me for several reasons, mainly because he is a man who is easy to connect with on a personal level (not politically, exactly), a family man and a politician who does not curse his opponents but discusses them with respect. He was a very beloved figure (it is clear that the shock in the US is very great, right-wing TV hosts cried on the air, people who are not so sensitive like Ben Shapiro or Patrick Beit David also cried {authentically, not like Deri and the Onion} in the broadcasts surrounding the event) and for years it has disgusted me how people define as delusional, messianic, extremist, spreaders of hatred and the like’ personalities who do not know a word of their words firsthand, just because they are on the other side. And then, on a respected platform like the website, I find it exactly – Immediately after the man was murdered (needless to say, you don't murder someone you don't agree with, even if they were a real anti-Semite), it bothered me a lot. In the first question I answered, a man accused Kirk of "numerous anti-Semitic expressions." Anyone who has heard even a little of Kirk's words will chuckle at this accusation. This was his first explanatory asset in his rise to power in Israel (long before the war). It is clear that the questioner (who didn't really try to ask) learned about Kirk from that Wikipedia entry, and then, absurdly, accused Kirk of lies and hatred.

I will note that supporting Israel does not prove that it does not have anti-Semitic expressions. The two can easily coexist. Certainly when Israel is against Muslims.

True. I noticed when I wrote, I assumed the rabbi would notice this point and I thought to expand, but I have extended it enough. There is no doubt that this is not anti-Semitic, ironically, it is a false plot. You can read the discussions on Wikipedia where readers were astonished at this catalog given under such a poor excuse.

Thank you for the rabbi deciding not to delete and answering. (I didn't receive an email notification so I just saw it now)
If the rabbi doesn't know, this is really a pointless question. (Makes sense considering that most of his work is on social media).
The points the rabbi raised are important. Maybe I exaggerated in the descriptions but this is an important person in the information arena from the side of Israel and from the side of the right in general.
(- Maybe not all the arguments of the left can be easily refuted but the level of arguments in the US among students is very low so in this case it was easy and entertaining). In any case, thank you

Ironically, a blood libel*