Why doesn’t God prove that he exists?

שו”ת › Category: faith › Why doesn’t God prove that he exists?

asked 8 years ago

Peace be upon the honor of the Rebbe, the Minister of the View and the Great One of the Generation in Faith, who established a high priest of faith, etc.
Why doesn’t God prove that he exists?
In the name of the moralists and the overseers who believe that difficulties in faith are trials, and come from desires, etc. – Shafir.
But according to Rabbi Micha Desover, all who are infidels are guilty of sin. Why does God not reveal Himself and include them in a system of reward and punishment? Isn’t this a huge question about His very existence?

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

0 Answers

0 Vote Up Vote Down

מיכי Staff answered 8 years ago

I don’t think so. First, he did prove his existence. See my notebooks. The fact that there are those who don’t learn the lesson for various reasons is no more the fault of God than it is of those who choose to do various evil acts in his name or against him. We have choice and discretion, and we make decisions and form positions. He is not to blame for our positions. Second, perhaps he has good reasons not to prove his existence. For example, so that secularism, which has advanced the world and religious thought quite a bit, can be created. And third, even if I think he did have to prove himself, the fact that he doesn’t just mean that his mind works differently than mine. It must be remembered that the conclusion that he exists is derived from other arguments, and if they are good arguments then that is the obvious conclusion from them. And if you have a problem (which I don’t think is difficult) then stay with the CSA. But why does the fact that he doesn’t prove himself lead to the conclusion that he doesn’t exist? What about the multitude of arguments that show that he does exist? As mentioned, at most he exists and his considerations are not clear to us. So far the minister’s speech, Place of the seal (-)

Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

ישי replied 8 years ago

If there was absolute proof that he exists, then the conclusion is that he exists and his considerations are not clear to us. Since you don't think so but that it is probable, then this issue should enter the balance of probabilities, so that the bottom line is not to go from 'exists' to 'exists and his considerations are not clear', but to go from 'chance P that he exists' to 'chance Q that he exists' when Q<P (surely the marking will be reversed when I send it and the intelligent reader, and the minister's wife, will have to figure it out on their own).

PS. Is it possible to be appointed deputy minister? What is the salary? Where does his wife's wife go?

מיכי Staff replied 8 years ago

Indeed, and still Q is significant enough. And that's only assuming that it's really true that he was supposed to prove its existence. And I challenged that too. So, in the end, the picture doesn't really change.
You can be a deputy minister without a portfolio, and I mean (deputy minister) without a portfolio, not deputy (minister without a portfolio). Actually, maybe a deputy without a portfolio for a minister without a portfolio. The letter was sent to the minister's portfolio.

ישי replied 8 years ago

Which raises the important question of whether it is possible for a deputy with a portfolio to be a minister without a portfolio. And supposedly it must be proven that a deputy minister without a minister is a scoundrel, but it must be rejected, and it seems that this depends on the investigation into whether the portfolio is delegated or handed over, and if so, this depends on the world of difference between the world of nobility and the rest of the world.
And I wrote the following.

ר' replied 8 years ago

It seems that from the ink of the minister's pen, sensitive information regarding the divine origin of the five sacred notebooks was leaked: "He did prove its existence. See my notebooks." But as we know, all great ministers fail with their tongues in keeping state secrets.

מיכי Staff replied 8 years ago

🙂 🙂
And the poet has already said about that: “All respect to the minister” (Montefiore, Yehoram Gaon).

עוזיה replied 8 years ago

And he had already preceded the righteous minister Yosef, in his words, "Does not God have solutions? Tell me, please."

ר' replied 8 years ago

And the world is already familiar with the question of why ten ministers without portfolios are needed, if it is possible to appoint one minister without ten portfolios.

מיכי Staff replied 8 years ago

And I found in the book Malchuta Dara'a with glosses by Kalbin Dachzepin that he wrote to settle the question that if they had appointed one minister without ten portfolios, they would have had to appoint nine more ministers in order to spend the money they had saved. And read carefully.