Why study Gemara?
Strange question. I’ll try to explain.
If the depth of these ideas is already intellectual, philosophical beliefs. And we often end up hanging the first disagreements, etc. on philosophical matters, on the essence of time, of ideas, etc., then isn’t it better to see the source itself in the philosophical illustrative books (Kant, Leibniz, etc.). Why all this long road?!
And the commandment of “T”? The commandment of “T” can also be for my friends who study Kant in this way, and as explained in the chapter “T”.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
One does not study the issues just to reach philosophical conclusions. That is inherent in the halacha itself. Beyond that, there is no relationship here of source and branches. Kant is no more a source than the Gemara, nor is he any less. With all due respect to Kant, he did not create or discover the timeline.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
