Wisdom against fools
Hello Rabbi.
A rumor reached my ears that some owners of stolen phones are planning to target those who own smart phones without paying the fine. Now, one of my acquaintances suggested giving up the smartphone before Rosh Hashanah and winning it after it, thus fulfilling the obligation, for fear that those fools will carry out their threat. The question is, does the forfeiture count as long as the phone is inside the house and it is impossible for a stranger to win it?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
- I don’t think it will help, because the person who sticks the stick intends not to remove anyone who uses a smartphone regardless of formal ownership. In the UK, no one uses it anyway.
- If he is that foolish or evil, it is doubtful whether he can even issue a warrant for his arrest.
- If he adopts this policy himself, he is not fulfilling his mission (unless the public itself has determined it as a rule), and if he is not a messenger again, it is doubtful whether he is taking anyone out. A messenger who changed. Although there is a peppercorn, does it hear as a useful season without a mission, and so on.
- To your question, the forfeiture of course counts, since you forfeited it and intended not to regain it by purchasing a farmstead. So it is forfeited. Are the seventh fruits not forfeited when you did not forfeit the field and the road to them? Of course it is.
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It would be a novelty to say that even the shofar is not necessary.
As the Rambam writes (in detail in the Pariyor in Dor, 1) and so does the Tshuva in the halakhah of 1796, the mitzvah is to hear and not to blow (as is the case with the one who blows into the pit if the sound of the pit does not come out. And if the mitzvah is to blow, why did it not come out! However, it must be rejected and rejected), and if in this way the one who hears comes out by himself when he hears, and does not hear according to the law that the one who blows brings it out, 1881. However, it is certain that there must be a shofar sound of a mitzvah, there must be a hefza of a mitzvah and not just any sound, and as the rabbi explained in the HaZo'a (O'H 29:4), and therefore, among other things, there must be an intention of the blower and the hearer. And if the blower has the intention of expelling only a few people (and not everyone who hears), it seems that this is still considered a shofar sound of a mitzvah (it does not seem to be divided and say that for so-and-so it is a sound/hefza of a mitzvah and for an unknown person it is not). Therefore, in such a case, the others also leave (whom the attacker did not intend to do) 18:18.
Does the Rabbi agree?
Of course. But the question was about a side that does need a speaker's intention.
You should look into the fact that there is no choice, if you exclude even those who do not have a cell phone, because they do not know who they are excluding! And you should search for this on Google 🙂
However, anyone who has a cell phone can find an online course to learn to blow the shofar, and blow it themselves. Maybe they will get a shofar online for cheap 🙂
Provided as a service to the public by the ‘Shofar – Market’ network with the blessing of ‘The network Sfatinu Ya'arev PrenichÙ
It's not always a matter of a householder making a decision on his own, often the community rabbi decides on it.
For example, the Rebbe of Moiznitz previously announced in advance that he would not issue a warning to smartphone users, and this concerns a congregation of thousands of worshippers.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
