Zeno’s paradox

Good morning!
Zeno in his paradoxes wanted to prove that, for example, the concept of motion is not as we perceive it, but in reality itself there is no motion at all (both in space and time) and everything we perceive as motion is only in consciousness (that is, in a phenomenon?). I imagined it this way – as if a cartoon is made of countless pictures and all the motion is only in the connection between them and not in reality but in the presentation towards God towards everything (perhaps according to Kant, and apparently there is confirmation of this from Einstein, that time and space are only a perception of man, so it follows that reality itself does not move, but we perceive parts of it?)
And I asked, to the extent that in our perception we divide space to infinity, then it is still true that the entire concept of movement is only in consciousness, but even there it is not understood how it is done, since consciousness itself also divides to infinity (and not reality itself divides), and so what is the use of saying that movement is the fruit of consciousness, when it is difficult to explain it?
Thank you very much!