A baby who was captivated by one prohibition

It has nothing to do with the baby being captured. Regarding the other person’s failure, I wrote about it in column 503 and in this article: https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=f18e4f052adde49eb&q=https://mikyab.net/%25D7%259B%25D7%25AA%25D7%2591%25D7%2599%25D7%259D/%25D7%259E%25D7%2590%25D7%259E%25D7%25A8%25D7%2599%25D7%259D/%25D7%259E%25D7 %2597%25D7%2599%25D7%25A8%25D7%2594-%25D7%25A9%25D7%259C-%25D7%2594%25D7%25A1%25D7%2595%25D7%2591%25D7%259C%25D7 %25A0%25D7%2595%25D7%25AA/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiBgZfpgNSHAxXKcKQEHdddEjQQFnoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2JPpeR-59_yDiCqgF5wEFV Although this name deals with the opposite case, in my opinion it would be the same for this case. Although in my article on Hamura and Kola I brought a discussion of exactly such a case from Manchat Shlomo on behalf of the KTS and more, see there: https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=f18e4f052adde49eb&q=https://mikyab.net/%25D7%259B%25D7%25AA%25D7%2591%25D7%2599%25D7%259D/%25D7%259E%25D7%2590%25D7%259E%25D7%25A8%25D7%2599%25D7%259D/ %25D7%25A2%25D7%259C-%25D7%25A7%25D7%2595%25D7%259C%25D7%2590-%25D7%2595%25D7%2597%25D7%2595%25D7%259E%2 5D7%25A8%25D7%2590/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiPyd-FgdSHAxVYVaQEHRJ7KJoQFnoECAgQAg&usg=AOvVaw12NUHtguxFhsJkfpQEaSzp But all of this is about causing the other person to commit a crime. Here it is using the actions of the other person and this is forbidden. It is like a handshake that is like your own action.