Between Reform and Halacha Observant
Greetings to Maran Shlita.
I thought that in order to settle once and for all the well-known controversy about what a Reformist is, it might be worth saying that anyone who draws their halachic conclusions based on halachic sources and logic derived from the halachic law, no matter how far-fetched their position, is not a Reformist. Perhaps one should not trust their rulings or eat from their kashrut, but they are all wrong. On the other hand, a person who draws whatever he wants based on nothing and calls himself a Jewish sect is indeed a Reformist (by the way, most Reformers in the social definition draw their conclusions on nothing, and some are even atheists. The Reform community today is nothing more than a Jewish identity for secular people abroad).
But after my brilliant solution to this complicated issue, I was left with one question: What is the right of a person to know the honor of a person who claims to change the law based on logic alone (such as that the Sages were mistaken in legal logic, in physical reality) or more than that, to change or abolish parts of the law based on social norms, such as allowing a woman to testify or stopping circumcision (perhaps I got carried away here), and the like?
Peace from the Holy Mountain.
This is roughly the definition I proposed in my articles (if it’s brilliant, I take it as a compliment).
https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7% 93%D7%94-%D7%96%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9 C-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%97%D7%A1-%D7%9C%D7%92%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95/
I didn’t understand what “from logic alone” meant. It’s always an argument based on logic (the logic of the arguer, of course).
Leave a Reply
Peace from the Holy Mountain.
This is roughly the definition I proposed in my articles (if it’s brilliant, I take it as a compliment).
https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7% 93%D7%94-%D7%96%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9 C-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%97%D7%A1-%D7%9C%D7%92%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95/
I didn’t understand what “from logic alone” meant. It’s always an argument based on logic (the logic of the arguer, of course).
Leave a Reply
Peace from the Holy Mountain.
This is roughly the definition I proposed in my articles (if it’s brilliant, I take it as a compliment).
https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7% 93%D7%94-%D7%96%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9 C-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%97%D7%A1-%D7%9C%D7%92%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95/
I didn’t understand what “from logic alone” meant. It’s always an argument based on logic (the logic of the arguer, of course).
Leave a Reply
Peace from the Holy Mountain.
This is roughly the definition I proposed in my articles (if it’s brilliant, I take it as a compliment).
https://mikyab.net/%D7%9B%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%9D/%D7%94%D7%90%D7%9D-%D7%99%D7%A9-%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7% 93%D7%94-%D7%96%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A0%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94-%D7%A2%D7%9 C-%D7%94%D7%99%D7%97%D7%A1-%D7%9C%D7%92%D7%95%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%95/
I didn’t understand what “from logic alone” meant. It’s always an argument based on logic (the logic of the arguer, of course).
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
