Criticism of the Rabbi’s teachings

Now I see that you sent another question with the links. I am attaching it here:
The links to the review articles were accidentally not included. I am attaching it here –
http://www.kipa.co.il/שאל-את-הרב/וגעדות-ומעת/

http://www.angelfire.com/va3/amielectroni_2003/site/archive/choveret_kenes/fish.htm

The first has no criticism that can be addressed.
The second is nonsense. There is no such thing as “above reason”. These are Milley's empty platitudes. And his difficulties in identifying skepticism and postmodernism are not difficulties. Indeed, it is almost the same and the fact that postmodernists think they are something new does not mean that they are right. Second, there is something different in the melody, because the skeptics are left with a question mark and the postmodernists put an exclamation mark at the end. They supposedly define the concept of truth differently (and in fact there is nothing behind this except the negative statement).
See my lecture on this subject here:

Thank you. And regarding Rabbi Kelner's book? What does the Rabbi think?

I didn't read it.