Intuition and intellect

But with reason, one can come to an understanding and refinement of what morality is and what moral action is. Intuition is everyone's private judge and a person will do what is right in their own eyes. This can lead to the destruction of society.

I said there is no difference. Are you claiming there is? What is it? Every logical argument is based on assumptions, and these come from intuition.

Okay, so basic premises come from intuition, I get it. But do you agree that on top of them there must be a rational argument? For example, there is an intuition that there is some kind of higher power. That is the basic premise of the discussion. On top of that, if you want to get to a specific God, you must make a continuous logical argument, purely rational.

No. Sometimes intuition is enough and sometimes logical analysis is helpful.

The strange assumption underlying your discussion is that you're dealing with a case where logical analysis is useful, and then you ask whether it's worth doing. Of course it is. Why not use the tool at your disposal?! It's just an empty discussion.

The Rabbi is right, in the case that they can come together there is no problem, I was wrong, forgive me.
From the Rabbi's perspective, if they conflict, is there no priority for one over the other? If I came to one conclusion intuitively, and another conclusion through mental analysis, is there no priority for one over the other?
Thanks for everything Rabbi, it is really not obvious

If there is such a thing as a clash between reason and intuition. Everything you call reason includes intuition. I repeat myself, and I think I've exhausted it.