Question regarding pre-disqualified witnesses
Let’s assume theoretically that most jurists would allow bringing disqualified witnesses to the wedding of secular people.
So this would have required the issuance of a fictitious ketubah.
Isn’t this stealing the minds of the innocent “married” couple?
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
0 Answers
This question has already been asked and I answered yes. Why do I need to repeat it again and open another thread?
Theft of knowledge has nothing to do with its writing. First of all, they could not have written a ketubah. And even if they had, the witnesses signed a lie. Theft of knowledge is essentially presenting the act as a valid Kiddushin. What’s more, the husband’s obligation may exist even without the Kiddushin, since he signed it (unless the inapplicability of the Kiddushin is grounds for annulling it).
Discover more from הרב מיכאל אברהם
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
