Question regarding pre-disqualified witnesses
Let’s assume theoretically that most jurists would allow bringing disqualified witnesses to the wedding of secular people.
So this would have required the issuance of a fictitious ketubah.
Isn’t this stealing the minds of the innocent “married” couple?
This question has already been asked and I answered yes. Why do I need to repeat it again and open another thread?
Theft of knowledge has nothing to do with its writing. First of all, they could not have written a ketubah. And even if they had, the witnesses signed a lie. Theft of knowledge is essentially presenting the act as a valid Kiddushin. What’s more, the husband’s obligation may exist even without the Kiddushin, since he signed it (unless the inapplicability of the Kiddushin is grounds for annulling it).
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer
