Sea on Saturday

Maybe they didn't do it because there is no sea in Bnei Brak, Yeruham, and Lod

But to say "Shimat Kol Chai" on Shabbat HaShachem in Acre in the sea (which is separate of course) from experience is really disturbing, bordering on frightening, about the idea

So maybe it's considered that they did?

Narli is permitted and commanded
Because Shabbat is not a holiday
Shabbat at sea will be enjoyed

What about a privately owned pool?

Implement my answer above.

Regarding shaking water in Carmelit and the obligation to wipe, I received a comment from chatgpt:

Shulchan Aruch (O’Haq Sha’a S’b) rules that the water on a person’s body is void of him and is not defined as a separate object.

Mishnah Berurah there (Sky’g) explains that it is similar to mud on the feet or dust on clothes — they are a nuisance to the person and are not “shaken” by themselves.

As long as the water is naturally on the skin (attached after bathing), it is part of your body for the purpose of this law.

Oren, you are a bigger AI expert than me, and you are probably familiar with the phenomenon of hallucinations. It turns out that it also exists in Giphy 5.

In defense of the AI, I used the regular 5 model and not 5 thinking. But in any case, the explanations sound correct to me. And I also thought that it was no different from rain, where water droplets also stick to the body and you shake them, and no one has forbidden such shaking. In other words, I ask why it would be forbidden to shake seawater that has stuck to the body in light of the AI's explanations and the comparison to rain.

There is a difference between drops on the body and water that you want to remove/wipe off. If the former is perhaps useless, the latter is not.

By the way, is thinking less delusional or just thinking better?

Both in my unfounded opinion.

Regarding drops on the body, even in the case of heavy rain I have to wipe myself off. Furthermore, if there was a problem with shaking water that was tested on the body in the sea on Shabbat, entry into the sea should have been completely prohibited because there is no way you can not shake the water because you can't shake a towel for the purpose of wiping.

Whatever you want to wipe is not invalid in my opinion. And of course, if there is a problem with the towel, then it is not allowed.

So according to this, someone who gets very wet in heavy rain and wants to dry off due to the excessive wetness, should stand in place?

In principle, yes. One should discuss the one who is busy and does not intend to.

By the way, in the old reply you wrote something else:

Excellent question. There is a difference (beyond the amount of water, which is also different) that in the sea I bring the water up to me and in the rain it happens to me from outside. But I really don't see any reason to separate.

These are exactly the two explanations I gave. And there is still no difference in explanation. If he is clear that the prohibition is from the Lord, will we also permit it there because there is no choice? Let him stand his ground, there is no advice and no wisdom against the Lord. And taking water from the river or the river is also not good for him. These explanations are extremely weak.

See this link:
https://mikyab.net/%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%AA/%D7%98%D7%9C%D7%98%D7%95%D7%9C-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%91%D7%A9%D7%91%D7%AA/

I didn't see anything different there.

I thought about this matter again, and it reminded me of what you said about yeshiva heads who have no connection with homeowners who can tell them that a certain ruling of theirs is not common sense (unlike yeshiva students). Here too, it seems to me that it is impossible for someone who gets very wet in the rain and continues to walk despite it to commit some offense or perform some work on Shabbat. It simply goes against common sense. It is possible that when you analyze the sources and try to compare word for word, this is what comes out, but the end result seems very strange to me.

It is possible. And yet such a feeling can be a motivation to seek a halakhic explanation. In order to permit, you need to find a halakhic explanation. You could perhaps say that as long as I am wet and I do not have the option to wipe the liquid off me, it is void. Or that the rain fell on me and there is no displacement here but at most an assumption, unlike rainwater. What's more, these are liquids that I am not interested in.