Touching a woman
Rabbi Golinkin wrote: We We saw above that there is no garlic Prohibition on contact vague between Men and women In the Torah, In Safra, In the Talmud The Babylonian, And at my place Great The judges such as The Rambam“M, The column, The table edited and edited The table. onlyIn Jerusalem there is opinion That is forbidden serve as touch Bidet of The pervert, but Allow you The thing From This is about In contactshort. The strict ones Expand you The ban of Kariba to Pubic hair On the second Directions – they Past From a hug And Nishoqper contact; And they Past From the list Incest In Boyka Y“H per woman In the world From that she is supplier Neda. nothing garlicbase Talmud or I went. For two The expansions These. The trend The strictest this Indoor probably In literatureMorality And in the midrashim Late and not In literature Halacha. if someone or Someone Want aggravate on himselfas a Degree piety difficult prevent you this from him, but desirable Very stop teach and demand That is forbidden For a mantouch In a woman or press you Her hand, thing that there is no him garlic base I went..
finally, if woman Reaching out hand For a man Must The man press you Her hand Why? “respect The creatures repulsive ProhibitionDurban” — easy and material which is repulsive custom that there is no him garlic base I went.. like yes, “all The bleach penny His friendpublicly As if Pouring Bloody” or “nothing him part forever next“.
Does the Rabbi agree?
I agree in principle. Regarding a woman extending a hand, I completely agree. Regarding just touching that is not affectionate, indeed, in my opinion there is no prohibition. But touching that is affectionate (sexual affection) even if it is not a hug or a kiss is prohibited. We do not hate each other.
Regarding the transition from urban to rural, I think such an expansion certainly has room for explanation.
Shmuel. You quoted that respect for human beings repels the rabbis. On the surface, the distinction is simple, there is a difference between a rabbinical prohibition simply, and a prohibition whose purpose is to exclude someone from killing and not specifically engaging in fornication. Apparently, they didn't just expand the exclusions.
The first ones disagreed about the accessories of the Rabbis, whether they must kill them.
Leave a Reply
Please login or Register to submit your answer