Question

Hello Rabbi,
Regarding your proof from Taylor, couldn’t one say that the world I do in fact see, I see precisely because of my eyes, so that by definition there will be a fit between the two? In other words, my seeing the world is a result of the evolutionary development of my eyes, and therefore of course I can rely on what I see, because there is a definitional fit between the two.

That is, I don’t rely on evolution as having created an absolute correspondence between how I see the world and how it really is, because there is truly no guarantee of that if evolution’s goal is survival. Rather, I rely on evolution in the sense that the form of the world that I see thanks to the eyes I have—that form is what is conducive to my survival. In other words, the world I am in any case forced to deal with in order to survive is the world my eyes reflect to me, and not a world to which I need to “adapt.”
Thank you