Questions following the discussion on Alma

Following the discussion with Prof. David Enoch, several questions arose in my mind:

1. You claimed that good is "forced" on God. That is, good does not depend on God. If so, this is a position similar to David's position. How is good that does not depend on God different from the moral facts that David spoke about?
2. From another perspective, it seems that you also believe in the existence of at least one moral fact, which is the obligation to obey God's command. How is this fact different from David's facts?
3. During the conversation, you seem to avoid saying that God has desires. why? That sounds very reasonable and I even think you've argued this before. Do you think there's a philosophical problem with such a position?

It was a very interesting and productive discussion. Thank you very much for it and I hope there will be more like it.