I know that it is forbidden to argue about the final results because there is a written decree that something that is accepted by the entire public without question is obligatory to be accepted, and apart from the Talmud's seal, nothing will be accepted by the public in an absolute way, so it is permissible to argue about the first results (perhaps not recommended). So my question is, is this the basis for the conservatism accepted in Haredi circles, from the Hatam Sofer to Rabbi Shach, who used to say that things that were accepted by the public, even if not completely, but by the majority of the public, there is a strong reason to keep them, even if not necessarily a strong reason, so is this really a good foundation for this principle? What do you think?27 צפיות0 תשובות0 קולות
