He understands why I called him.

I am currently reading the third book in the trilogy. At the beginning of your writing, you wrote about the distinction between a verse that commands and a verse that indicates. Then you wrote that every offense has two aspects. The content and the command. The content can be learned from the explanation, but ultimately it lacks a command. For a command, you must command.
 
In light of this, I didn't really understand the claim in the Talmud, "It is clear why I read." What does it mean that the reading came to add a dimension of commandment!
I would be happy to clarify.