Q&A: Regarding Your Claim That God Conceived and Carried Out Evolution
Regarding Your Claim That God Conceived and Carried Out Evolution
Question
Hi, I’ve read some of the books you wrote, and I’ve also happened to hear podcasts featuring you, and I enjoyed them מאוד. I’ve noticed in several places that among your range of arguments (deep and illuminating!!) you place particular emphasis on the possible connection between creationism and evolution, arguing that evolution has not fulfilled its obligation regarding the question of who designed it itself—and therefore its designer must be God. I assume the summary I wrote of your argument is poor relative to its depth and scope, but I would like to know whether the idea that evolution was conceived and carried out by God is compatible with Judaism and with the philosophical principles known to us. First, if evolution was carried out by God, then how is it that in the Book of Genesis the creation of man is written as that of a perfect creature, and evolution is not mentioned even by hint? (The question also applies to the creation of the world, but the creation of man is written more clearly.) Second, doesn’t evolution indicate a divine deficiency?! Well known are Maimonides’ comments struggling with the words of the Holy One, blessed be He, “I regret…” and likewise in Job, where the Holy One, blessed be He, tells Satan that he incited Him against Job for nothing. The concept of God connects—both Jewishly and philosophically—to perfection that tolerates no deficiency. Trial and error such as evolution, as I understand it, cannot fit with divine perfection. And one final question, which I don’t know whether it is right to call a theological question [perhaps it would be better to place it in the realm of divine psychology, and I mean the field that developed (mainly, as I understand it, following or together with Hasidic thought, which tries to portray God psychologically—sometimes as a father, sometimes as a rebbe, and sometimes as a nobleman…) in order to understand God’s motives and modes of action]: why would the God we know—the God of Judaism—who does not need to rely on rabbinic sayings for us to realize that He knows what He wants from Himself and from His world—bring about evolution? Another point I didn’t fully understand from reading your book is whether, in your view, this claim can be reconciled with the well-known rabbinic sayings, “He looked into the Torah and created the worlds,” “He created worlds and destroyed them,” and more and more from rabbinic thought—or whether you mean to say that even if the Sages disagreed with this, this is the only way to uphold the existence of God in our modern world.
Answer
- The Torah does not teach us science. It says there that the Holy One, blessed be He, created the world, and that is indeed true. Nachmanides already writes that there is no plain meaning there, and that it is all allegory meant to teach other matters. It is not a factual description of creation.
2. The Holy One, blessed be He, decided to create life by way of evolution. Why is there any deficiency here? He wants a world that perfects itself. Search here for columns about perfection and self-perfection.
3. I am not committed to anything in the rabbinic literature that is not Jewish law. I also do not think they had metaphysical information that I do not have. Hasidic thought generally does not speak to me. Science shows us that God decided to create His world this way, and that’s that. I don’t see any difficulty here.
Discussion on Answer
It’s there on verse 1 and a bit on verse 8.
Here is a passage from verse 1:
And the answer is that the Account of Creation is a deep secret; it cannot be understood from the verses, nor can it be fully known except through the tradition passed down to Moses our teacher from the mouth of the Almighty, and those who know it are obligated to conceal it. Therefore Rabbi Isaac said that the Torah did not need to begin with “In the beginning God created,” nor with the account of what was created on the first day, what was done on the second day, and the other days, nor with the elaboration on the formation of Adam and Eve, their sin and punishment, and the story of the Garden of Eden and Adam’s expulsion from it, for none of this can be understood with complete comprehension from the written text. All the more so the story of the generation of the Flood and the Dispersion, whose necessity is even less great. It would have been enough for those devoted to the Torah even without these verses, and they would believe in general what is mentioned to them in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:10): “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day,” while the deeper knowledge would remain for the select few among them as a law given to Moses at Sinai, together with the Oral Torah.
I’d be happy for a more precise source in Nachmanides.