חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

Q&A: Reason versus Emotion

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

Reason versus Emotion

Question

Is it correct to say that reason is empty? That it only presents data, and what really determines things is the will—the soul? For example, if I place a glass of water before someone who hasn’t drunk for several days and is about to die, reason could only tell him: if you drink, you will continue living (because the water will provide substances that you need), but everything depends on the will, and if he doesn’t want to live he won’t drink.
Or is that not so, and reason is something substantial—the rational faculty determines what is correct from a rational standpoint, and there is also another emotional system… And regarding the example above, reason would also take another step [and not only say that water will cause him to keep living] but would say that from a rational standpoint living is good… except that there is also another system of emotions, which also has a say [and a person can feel that life has no meaning for him].

Answer

You’re not being precise. What you mean to say is that it is empty of values and norms and can teach only facts. But that is not correct. First, facts are not learned from reason but from observation. Reason only generalizes facts or makes analogies, and the like. Beyond that, in my opinion reason also recognizes values, and not only facts.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button