Q&A: Regarding the Survival of the Soul
Regarding the Survival of the Soul
Question
Shabbat shalom, Michi. The view of many medieval authorities (Rishonim) is well known, foremost among them Gersonides (he at least addresses this directly and clearly), that a person’s thoughts and experiences (what is called in secular language “the acquired intellect”) are themselves his soul, and they do not go anywhere when a person dies. This theory has many practical implications regarding principles of faith / belief: whether one who denies them has no share in the World to Come as a form of “punishment,” or whether this is simply the reality—that his intellect did not grasp eternal thoughts and therefore is not eternal.
In any case, I would like to ask whether you accept this theory, and if not, why not; and what is the surviving soul, if not the above.
Answer
I don’t think any of the medieval authorities (Rishonim) could know that, and neither can I. As for the question of the status of someone who denies this—everyone thinks what they think, and defining him as a heretic or not, assuming such a thing even exists, has no importance at all.