חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

Q&A: Confiscating Property Used to Commit an Offense Without Authority

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

Confiscating Property Used to Commit an Offense Without Authority

Question

Hello Rabbi,
Recently I heard about a case of a soldier who secretly filmed girls in the train-station restroom by leaving his phone there in recording mode. One of the girls grabbed his phone when she happened to discover it. My question is: is she allowed to continue holding on to it? Or is only an authorized body allowed to do something like that, such as confiscation by the police?
Best regards,

Answer

She absolutely can. In my opinion, she could even break it if she does not trust the authorities to prevent the harm. This falls under the law of a pursuer.

Discussion on Answer

Oren (2024-09-16)

If we assume she deleted the video in which she was filmed, and we assume there is no concern that she will be harmed, can she still continue to keep the phone?

Michi (2024-09-16)

No, unless she is concerned about similar use and cannot rely on the police.

Persecuted Party (2024-09-16)

Rabbi, why is this considered the law of a pursuer?

Michi (2024-09-16)

He is pursuing her in order to harm her. Like an informer regarding property (whom it is permitted to kill). See also Maimonides at the end of the laws of One Who Injures a Person or Property.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button