Question

Hello.
I’m trying to understand your view on providence better.
 
If I got up in the morning and went out into the street, and saw that the whole neighborhood was empty of people (at an hour when it is usually bustling),
my first thought would be that I had missed a warning that terrorists were roaming around here, and if not that, then there was radioactive fallout or some especially violent bacteria.
Only after I had called the police, Magen David Adom, the neighbors, etc., and ruled out all the possibilities, would I conclude that this was a very unusual case: Reuven was tired after a wedding, Shimon left early to pay a shiva call, Levi is recovering from surgery, Issachar was hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital, and so on (x10,000). Very rare, but it can’t be ruled out.
Why, in the miracle in Gedera, do you prefer to define it as an unusual event (which indeed can happen), rather than assuming that it has a cause (God’s providence)? After all, you yourself do not rule out in principle that God can act in the world (if He wants to), and in the past He also did so.
And one more point (which is also important in itself for understanding your approach regarding the lack of providence): even if there is a scientific difficulty in understanding how God acts in the world against the laws of nature, since you believe in free choice, meaning that free choice does not contradict science, you could say that God acts in the world by changing people’s choices: He decided that that driver would not notice the red light, He decided that that neighbor would not notice the turn, that those hitchhikers would not want to travel with him today (and of course that same driver would not be punished for it).
 
I’d be happy to understand your view better