חדש באתר: מיכי-בוט. עוזר חכם על כתבי הרב מיכאל אברהם.

Atheist friend

שו"תקטגוריה: faithAtheist friend
שאל לפני 6 חודשים

1. When an atheist friend and I were talking, I argued that the world is very complex, he argued that it is not necessarily so.
When I told him to give me a monthly forecast, he got a little confused and said that this is not a complexity in reality, I argue that it is a complexity in reality. I would love to hear the Rabbi's perspective.
Additionally, when I asked him if he would see a fork/scarf of the Beitar Jerusalem football team in space if he claimed that there was a creator behind it, he claimed yes, but it depends, it depends on whether I have seen such a scarf before, because if not, it could be very random, I claim that it is irrational – and what bothered him was the parallel to the reality of a creator/maker and the world.
2. That friend asked me if I believed in the flood that occurred during Noah's time, and I told him yes. When I said yes, he said that there was no geological/archaeological proof that there ever was a flood on the scale described.
I answered him that it could be a parable/belief in a certain truth, and he claimed that it is easy for Judaism when it is a little difficult to escape from parables and ideas.
I would be happy to expand on the subject, Your Honor.


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

תגיות השאלה:

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 6 חודשים
1. The complexity of the world is objective. It has mathematical measures (entropy). According to this measure, a living being is much more complex than an inanimate being, for example. 2. Indeed true. When we decide that something is true, then when there is a difficulty about it we adopt different explanations, sometimes even forced ones. Everyone does this because it makes sense. He probably does this too. Here are three examples, one from himself. A. I assume that Israel is not committing war crimes in Gaza, so when I hear Yair Golan and Boogie Ya'alon claim that they are, I look for explanations for it (the hatred of Bibi that drives them). on. When evolutionists encounter a fact that seems to contradict the theory, such as the spread and coloration of the peacock's wings, they look for an explanation for it (Amotz Zehavi's principle of encumbrance). third. When he decides that there is no God and you present him with a counter-fact: the world is complex and unlikely to have been created on its own, he offers a narrow explanation: this complexity is imagined.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button